USPTO serial 87610990
ZOINKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEGGS, MONICA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZOINKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lainie E. Parker
26 Woodybrook LaneCroton-on-Hudson, NY 10520UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Outdoor activity games in the nature of croquet sets; party games; tabletop games; target games; backyard games in the nature of action skill games; basketball table top games; horseshoe games; volleyball game playing equipment; aero-dynamic disk for use in playing catching games; badminton game playing equipment; bats for games; equipment for playing a vertical hoop target game; game apparatus, namely, bases, bats and balls for playing indoor and outdoor games; nets for ball games; inflatable amusement products, namely, inflatable balls, inflatable inner tubes for aquatic recreational use; inflatable float mattresses for recreational use; inflatable pools for recreational use; inflatable toys; balls for sports and games; water toys; water squirting toys; nets for sports and ball games; children's multiple activity toys; flying discs; scuba and swim fins; swim floats for recreational use, namely, pool lounges, pool floats, and inflatable floats in the shape of recliners, chairs, islands and mats; pool and backyard games, namely, action skill games played with dive sticks, sport balls, ring games, and action skill games in the nature of bean bag toss games, washer toss games, ladder golf tossing games, pole-defense games, beach ball defense games, pool pong, and kubb; paddle ball games, bocce balls, croquet sets, volleyball game playing equipment sets, sports balls, sports goal sets for soccer and hockey, badminton sets, shuttlecocks, racquets for tennis, racquetball, and squash, tether balls, and ring games in the nature of ring toss; golf equipment, namely, golf balls and golf clubs; dart games, namely, lawn darts; discs for playing disc golf; horseshoes for recreational purposes, and tossing disc toys; amusement products, namely, inflatable balls; ride-on toys and accessories therefor, skateboards, roller skates, pogo sticks, toy tricycles for children, toy scooters and accessories therefor, in-line skates, caster boards, athletic protective elbow pads for skateboarding and skating, athletic protective knee pads for skateboarding, knee pads for athletic use | ACTIVE | Jul 9, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2019 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |