Drawing for WEEDHUB

USPTO serial 87612058

WEEDHUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WEEDHUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew N. Spivak

Andrew N. Spivak MOSAIC LEGAL GROUP, PLLC5185 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD, NW, SUITE 350WASHINGTON, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shirts, hats, and sweatersACTIVE—
035Online retail store services featuring clothingACTIVE—
041Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable video concerning the field of medical marijuana and recreational marijuanaACTIVE—
044Providing a website featuring news articles, editorials and opinions, medical studies, interviews, and essays in the field of the health benefits of medical and recreational marijuana useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 15, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 11, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 11, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 22, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 28, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance