USPTO serial 87612410
SKYPERSONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKYPERSONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for flying and navigating drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, aircraft and helicopters; electronics, namely, microprocessors, electrical circuits, electric motors, sensors, lights, navigation instruments and cameras for drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, aircraft and helicopters; positioning, monitoring and navigational control systems, namely, GPS receivers and wireless LAN receivers and ultra-wide band receivers; electronics, namely, microprocessors, electrical circuits, electric motors, sensors, lights, navigation instruments and cameras; drone and aircraft location tracking and navigation systems, namely, microprocessors, software for location tracking and navigation of drones and aircraft, electrical circuits, electric motors, GPS receivers and wireless LAN receivers and ultra-wide band receivers; indoor drone controllers and electronics, namely, microprocessors, electrical circuits, electric motors, sensors, lights, navigation instruments and cameras; automotive land vehicle, trailer and vehicle component location tracking and navigation systems, namely, microprocessors, software for location tracking and navigation of vehicles and trailers, electrical circuits, GPS receivers and wireless LAN receivers and ultra-wide band receivers; and animal and human location tracking and position monitoring systems, namely, microprocessors, software for location tracking and position monitoring of animals and humans, electrical circuits, GPS receivers and wireless LAN receivers and ultra-wide band receivers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Drones; unmanned aerial vehicles; aircraft; helicopters | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, classes, workshops, seminars and demonstrations for airplane and aircraft flight training and instruction; training pilots and operators of unmanned aerial vehicles and drones | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services for drone, unmanned aerial vehicle, aircraft and helicopter design, performance, usage and position monitoring; engineering services for positioning, monitoring and navigational control systems and electronics; automotive land vehicle engineering services; and aircraft engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Skypersonic, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Skypersonic, LLC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SKYPERSONIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |