USPTO serial 87614450
BLUELIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUELIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel Kramer
NATHANIEL KRAMER KIRSCHSTEIN, ISRAEL, SCHIFFMILLER & PIERONI, P.C.425 FIFTH AVENUE5TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016-2223Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Ultra violet lamps, namely, UVC lamps in the nature of germicidal lamps for use in disinfection, especially of packaging materials and surfaces; ultra violet laps, namely, UVC lamps in the nature of germicidal lamps for use in disinfecting products that come into physical contact with food and beverages, and in disinfection in forming, filling and sealing machines for food industries; disinfection apparatus incorporating UVC lamps for use in disinfecting products that come into physical contact with food and beverages, and in disinfection in forming, filling and sealing machines for food industries; parts and fittings for aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair service, all relating to Ultra violet lamps, especially UVC lamps for use in disinfection, especially of packaging materials and surfaces and relating to disinfection apparatus; installation, maintenance and repair service, all relating to ultra violet lamps, especially UVC lamps for use in disinfection in forming, filling and sealing machines for food industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development, design, consultancy, and advisory services all relating to Ultra violet lamps, especially UVC lamps for use in disinfection, especially of packaging materials and surfaces and relating to disinfection apparatus; development, design, consultancy, and advisory services all relating to ultra violet lamps, especially UVC laps for use in disinfection in forming, filling and sealing machines for food industries; Providing information in the field of design and product development of Ultra violet lamps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |