USPTO serial 87616063
AERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Josephs
David R. Josephs BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.40 Westminster Street, 3rd FLOORPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless access point (WAP) devices, wireless computer hardware and computer networking equipment, namely, signal transmitters and receivers in the field of supporting operations and managing wireless networks and mesh networks and mesh network utilities; communication hardware, namely, computer hardware and firmware in the field of controlling a wireless access point and wireless access point network in a communication hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |