USPTO serial 87616081
BEAR CREEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAR CREEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Epting
THOMAS W EPTING SMITH MOORE LEATHERWOOD LLPP O BOX 87GREENVILLE, SC 29602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, tops, bottoms, pants, outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, sweaters, pullovers, headwear, neck ties, footwear, underwear, pullovers, coats, jackets, gloves, sweaters, sweater vests, undergarments, socks, t-shirts, infant wear, and vests; leather clothing, cotton clothing, and nylon clothing, namely, shirts, pants, outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, sweaters, pullovers, headwear, socks, footwear, underwear, pullovers, coats, jackets, gloves, sweaters, sweater vests, undergarments, socks, t-shirts, infant wear, and vests; leather belts, cotton belts, and nylon belts; silk scarves, blended scarves, and neck ties; wool socks, cotton socks, and blended fabric socks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |