Drawing for BLUEFLEX

USPTO serial 87617489

BLUEFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUEFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian K. Yost

Brian K. Yost Decker Jones, P.C.BURNETT PLAZA SUITE 2000801 CHERRY STFORT WORTH, TX 76102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Shaft couplings for machines, namely flexible, elastomeric couplings for use with misaligned shaftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 12, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 12, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 9, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 9, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 6, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2019TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 27, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 2019OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 7, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 16, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance