Drawing for KING OF DIAMONDS ROSE

USPTO serial 87620642

KING OF DIAMONDS ROSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KING OF DIAMONDS ROSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lorri W. Cooper

Lorri W. Cooper Medley, Behrens & Lewis, LLC6100 Rockside Woods Blvd., Suite 440Independence, OH 44131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Brandy; Grape brandy from the Cognac region of France made in accordance with adopted standards; Distilled spiritsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 4, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 23, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance