Drawing for EXECUTIVE ARMOR

USPTO serial 87621204

EXECUTIVE ARMOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXECUTIVE ARMOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Casavale

CHRISTOPHER D. CASAVALE NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 SOUTH COLLEGE ST. SUITE 2300CHARLOTTE, NC 28202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring subscriptions featuring dietary and nutritional supplements; subscription-based order fulfillment services in the field of dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2018INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Oct 25, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance