Drawing for TORCH

USPTO serial 87623018

TORCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLACK, MILDRED ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TORCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcy L. Sperry

MARCY L. SPERRY Sperry IP Law LLC3550 Lenox Rd NE21st FloorAtlanta, GA 30326

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for allowing users to provide tips to law enforcement in the form of texts, messages, pictures, videos, electronic files and dataACTIVEAug 18, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 10, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 24, 2018AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2018IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 13, 2018AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 13, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 12, 2018EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance