Drawing for IR LAB

USPTO serial 87623588

IR LAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ONUOHA, UKACHUKWU FREDERICK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IR LAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu

Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC1540 WEST WARM SPRINGS ROAD, SUITE 100HENDERSON, NV 89014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Burglar alarms; Camcorders; Electronic tags for goods; Lightning conductors; Optical lenses; Solar batteries; Video cameras; Voltage stabilizing power supply; WebcamsABANDONEDAug 29, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 17, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 22, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 22, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 22, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 9, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance