USPTO serial 87624059
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Dunlap
THOMAS DUNLAP DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG PLLC211 CHURCH STREET SELEESBURG, VA 20175UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins; Dietetic foods adapted for medical use; Dietary supplements; Baby foods; Plant extracts for pharmaceutical purposes; Dietary fiber to aid digestion; Medicinal herbal preparations; Drug testing kits comprised of medical diagnostic reagents and assays for testing bodily fluids for the presence of disease and biomarkers; Fillings for teeth; Disinfectants; Medicinal preparations for the treatment of infectious diseases and for use in oncology; Contraceptive preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Coffee; Tea; Tea-based beverages; Flowers or leaves for use as tea substitutes; Honey; Grain-based food beverages; Cereal based snack food; Grain-based snack foods; Sugar; Seasonings; Tea-based beverages also containing Milk | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Beer; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Drinking water; Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of beverages; Non-alcoholic plant beverages, namely, non-alcoholic cactus-based beverages; Kvass non-alcoholic beverages; Vegetable juices beverages; Cola drinks | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |