USPTO serial 87624472
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee J. Eulgen
LEE J EULGEN NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO NORTH LASALLE STREETCHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for database management, data analysis and client retention programs, all relating to management of media and periodical subscriptions and customer data | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Marketing services; business marketing services; marketing research services; marketing analysis services; marketing advisory services; customer relationship management; all of the foregoing in the field of client retention programs, and none of the foregoing pertaining to computer hardware | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for database management, data analysis and client retention programs, all relating to management of media and periodical subscriptions and customer data | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |