Drawing for CLARITY BIOANALYTICS

USPTO serial 87624520

CLARITY BIOANALYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLARITY BIOANALYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chastity D. S. Whitaker, Ph.D.

CHASTITY D. S. WHITAKER, PH.D. AFMCLO/JAZ2240 B STREETBUILDING 11WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB, OH 45069

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for high throughput processing of digital images; software for processing digital images of cellular and biological materials; software for diagnosing infection of cellular and biological materials; software for diagnosing genetic treatments of cellular and biological samples/materials; software for diagnosing chemical treatments for cellular and biological materials; software for processing the colors and color intensities associated with digital images of cellular and biological materials; software for acquiring measurements of phenotypic features obtained from digital images of cellular and biological material; software for detecting biological characteristics and assessing biological behavior; software for processing measurements of phenotypic features obtained from digital images of cellular and biological materials from digital images; software to automate visualization of multi-parametric data analysis; software to retrieve images; software to facilitate parallelization for high speed computation; software to facilitate computation and processing on supercomputing systems; software to apply statistical methods for hit selection and well scoringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance