Drawing for FLAVORLOCK

USPTO serial 87624564

FLAVORLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLAVORLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

BETH M GOLDMAN ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN STREET SUITE 1100, IP PROSECUTION DEPARTIRVINE, CA 92614-8255UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible oil; edible olive oilACTIVEFeb 1, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 7, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 7, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 2020EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Jun 5, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2020CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
May 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 15, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 15, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2019CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 17, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 1, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 1, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Nov 8, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance