Drawing for SCLPT LOS ANGELES

USPTO serial 87625303

SCLPT LOS ANGELES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ONUOHA, UKACHUKWU FREDERICK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SCLPT LOS ANGELES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jaime B. Laurent, Esq.

12665 VILLAGE LN., STE 1423LOS ANGELES, CA 90094

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Physical fitness studio services, namely, providing group exercise instruction, equipment, and facilities; Providing physical fitness and exercise service, namely, indoor cycling and yoga instructionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 14, 2019OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION—
Feb 14, 2019IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Oct 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 15, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 2, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance