Drawing for JAY CHORD

USPTO serial 87625788

JAY CHORD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAY CHORD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent D. Sausser

BRENT D. SAUSSER SAUSSER SUMMERS, PC2 ROSEDALE DR.CHARLESTON, SC 29407UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring music and personal and musical information regarding a musical performer and his live and recorded performances; Music production services; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of live online non-downloadable visual and audio musical performances; Live performances by a musical group; Production of music; Production of musical sound recording; Production of musical videos; Production of sound and music video recordings; Providing a website featuring information in the field of music and entertainment; Providing on-line music, not downloadable; Providing on-line videos featuring music, not downloadableACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance