USPTO serial 87626897
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Edelman
SCOTT A. EDELMAN GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP2029 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 4000LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3026UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Salad kits consisting of pre-cut lettuce, pre-cut vegetables, pre-cut fruit, chicken, turkey, meat, eggs, processed beans all sold together as a unit with salad dressing and salad toppings consisting of, processed nuts, processed seeds, dried fruit, cheese, croutons, crispy rice noodles, tortilla strips, pita chips; Packaged vegetable salads; Packaged cut fruit; Salad mixes consisting primarily of pre-cut fresh lettuce and pre-cut fresh vegetables, served with salad dressings; Organic fruits and vegetables, namely, cut fruits, cut vegetables, sliced fruits, sliced vegetables; Fruit and vegetable salads; Fruit salads; Vegetable salads; Packaged salad kits consisting primarily of vegetables; Cut fruits; Cut vegetables; Sliced fruits; Sliced vegetables; Packaged meal kits consisting primarily of fresh vegetables and fruits, and also including sauces, meat proteins, herbs, spices, processed seeds, processed nuts and grains, namely, rice, couscous, quinoa, bulgur, and pasta, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |