Drawing for THE BLACKEST BLACK

USPTO serial 87627847

THE BLACKEST BLACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BLACKEST BLACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERICA D. KLEIN

ERICA D. KLEIN BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, socks, hosiery, tights, undergarments, intimate apparel, namely bras, panties, underwear and lingerie, loungewear, sleepwear, tops, bottoms, and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 4, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 7, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 17, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 17, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 2, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 11, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 6, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance