Drawing for NATURELAB. TOKYO

USPTO serial 87628466

NATURELAB. TOKYO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURELAB. TOKYO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLISON L. HAUGEN

ALLISON L. HAUGEN HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair cream; hair conditioner; hair spray; hair gel, hair tonic; hair mousse; hair rinse, hair lotion; hair mascara; hair wax; hair care preparations; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; cosmetics; shampoo; Hair shampoo; Non-medicated scalp shampoo; bath soaps; toothpaste; fragrances; perfume; false nails; false eyelashes; adhesives for affixing false hair; adhesives for affixing hairpieces; adhesives for affixing wigs; laundry starch; seaweed gelatin for laundry use (funori); adhesives for false eyelashesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 1, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 21, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 30, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 30, 2020GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 30, 2020GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 30, 2020CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 27, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 13, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 12, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance