USPTO serial 87628506
ROBOTIC DIGITAL MICROSCOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROBOTIC DIGITAL MICROSCOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
DANIEL M. GURFINKEL DENNEMEYER & ASSOCIATES, LLC.2 NORTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, SUITE 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer workstations consisting of computer hardware and software for gathering, storing, analyzing and transmitting patient image data for use in medical and surgical procedures; computer servers; computer software for processing digital images; computer software for use in training medical professionals in surgical procedures; computer software for use by medical professionals to practice surgical procedures; computer software for use by medical professionals to demonstrate surgical approaches; computer software for use in calibrating and configuring medical devices; augmented-reality computer software for use by medical professionals in performing surgical procedures; voice-recognition interfaces and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | surgical scopes; surgical illumination devices, namely, light sources, fibre optic illuminators, LED illuminators, light conduit, and spotlighting devices used to illuminate exposed tissue area; imaging devices for medical procedures, namely, video microscopes, digital microscopes, exoscopes, external scopes, external surgical cameras and lens assembly, optical coherence tomography imaging systems, hyperspectral imaging systems, fluorescence imaging systems, multispectral camera systems; medical and surgical robots; surgical device positioners, namely, semi-autonomous robotic positioning systems for positioning surgical optics devices; surgical instruments for training purposes; surgical tracking systems comprised of computer hardware and software, image display screens and video cameras that track the location of a patient and surgical instruments during surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |