Drawing for KYOTI

USPTO serial 87628871

KYOTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATT, JAIME L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KYOTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew E. Moersfelder

MATTHEW E. MOERSFELDER DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and peripherals; computer hardware and software for setting up and configuring local area networks; computer hardware and software for setting up cloud-based computing; computer hardware and software for wireless communication in the nature of wireless content delivery; antennas; antennas for wireless communication apparatus; communication antennas; satellite antennas; antenna systems and antenna terminals comprised primarily of electronic circuitry, tuning material, electrical interfaces, and temperature sensors, for satellite communications; antenna and electronic communication systems comprised of embedded computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; satellite antenna positioning systems; equipment and apparatus for antenna and electronic communication systems, namely, receivers, transmitters, processors, satellite dishes, and communications apparatus to transmit and/or receive communications from between fixed or mobile platforms and satellitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 25, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance