CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TOWER CRAFT INTELLIGENT TOWER CLEANER

USPTO serial 87629682

TOWER CRAFT INTELLIGENT TOWER CLEANER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURKE, JUSTINE N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOWER CRAFT INTELLIGENT TOWER CLEANER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1001 TEXAS AVE., STE. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning preparations for cleaning surfaces; general purpose polishing preparations; detergent soaps; glass cleaning preparationsACTIVE—
007Electric cleaning machines and apparatus, namely, robotic window cleaning machines for use in cleaning windows on high rise buildings and structuresACTIVE—
009Humanoid robots with artificial intelligenceACTIVE—
037Cleaning of external surfaces of buildings; window cleaning services; rental of cleaning machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance