USPTO serial 87629789
BENESERV CORPORATE BENEFITS HR SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BENESERV CORPORATE BENEFITS HR SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Crilly, Esquire
MICHAEL G. CRILLY, ESQUIRE LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL CRILLY104 SOUTH YORK ROADHATBORO, PA 19040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Human resources consultation, namely, assisting human resources departments to adopt and maintain employee benefit plans relating to health, retirement, and well-being of employees; payroll administration and management services; processing, administering and managing employee benefit plans relating to the physical health and well-being of employees; business consulting services relating to compliance with statutory, industry, and best practice provisions in the field of human resources; providing information in the field of employee benefit plans relating to the physical health and well-being of employees; consulting services namely, designing and implementing employee benefit plans relating to the physical health and well-being of employees | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Brokerage in the field of employee benefit plans; consulting services in the field of employee financial benefit plans, namely, designing and implementing employee benefit plans relating to retirement of employees; providing information in the field of employee financial benefit plans relating to retirement of employees; processing, administering and managing employee financial benefit plans relating to the retirement of employees | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Regulatory compliance consulting regarding statutory, industry and best practice provisions in the field of employee benefits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BeneServ Corporate Benefit Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BeneServ Corporate Benefit Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BENESERV CORPORATE BENEFITS HR SERVICES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |