Drawing for HALO

USPTO serial 87629883

HALO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HALO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew C. Aitken

ANDREW C. AITKEN IP LAW LEADERS, PLLC6701 DEMOCRACY BLVD.SUITE 555BETHESDA, MD 20817

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Camera hardware systems for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Radar object detectors for use on vehicles; Speed indicators; Dashboard cameras; Laser speed detectors; Lidar apparatus; Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; Vehicle detection equipment, namely, display monitors, computers, image sensors, video cameras, and operating system and application software to detect vehicle location; Wireless communication devices for transmitting images taken by a cameraACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use to receive data from remote detection devices relating to vehicle traffic violations; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for the detection and processing of data relating to traffic violationsACTIVE—
045Monitoring traffic violations with digital video cameras for traffic safety purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance