CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for COLLABORATIVE THINKING

USPTO serial 87630837

COLLABORATIVE THINKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5533530Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2018
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with COLLABORATIVE THINKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shauna M. Wertheim

Shauna M. Wertheim THE MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DRIVE15TH FLOORRESTON, VA 20191

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consulting and advisory services; Business consulting services in the fields of leadership development, conflict management, change management, strategic planning, problem solving, team building, goal alignment, culture assessment and shifts, organizational and team performance, and system and process assessment and redesign; Providing organizational development consulting services; Business consulting services, namely, facilitating business meetings; business mediation for others, namely, mediation of business agreements and business relationshipsACTIVEMar 7, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 26, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 7, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance