USPTO serial 87631005
DETROIT ELECTRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DETROIT ELECTRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell
MARY MARGARET L. O'DONNELL BLUE FILAMENT LAW PLLC700 E. MAPLE ROADSUITE 450BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; Software for mobile devices; Apparatus and instruments for conducting, distributing, transforming, switching, accumulating or regulating electricity and energy; Batteries, electric; Storage apparatus for electricity, including for charging accumulators or batteries for electric vehicles; Devices for regulating electricity; Electricity conduits; Electric control devices for energy management; Voice command and recognition software, speech to text conversion software, and voice-enabled software applications; Personal assistant software; Home automation and home device integration software; Electricity indicators; Speed indicators; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; On board computers for vehicles; Software for navigation systems; Software for inertial navigation systems; Software for vision navigation systems; Software for GPS navigation systems; GPS navigation devices; Gyroscopes; Gyro sensors using GPS functions; Vehicles; Land vehicles; Electric vehicles; Apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water; Electric automobile parts, fully battery electric, high performance sports automobile; Seats, upholstery, steering wheels, automobile wheel hubs; Vehicle wheels; Motor vehicle bodies; Vehicles, namely, automobiles; Motors; Motor land vehicles; Parts and fittings for vehicles; Clothing; Footwear; Headgear; Providing maintenance and repair services for automobiles; Building construction; Maintenance and repair of cars, motors and engines and parts of these goods; Cleaning of automobiles; Installation services; Recharging of batteries and accumulators; Providing information relating to the repair or maintenance of electric motors; Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; Industrial analysis and research services; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Software as a Service; Power grid response services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |