USPTO serial 87632469
SC²
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SC²?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Lee Yamato
LORI LEE YAMATO KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, newsletters, questionnaires, pamphlets, and printed instructional materials in the fields of health care, preventive health care, health wellness, and cardiovascular, cardiorenal and nephrology care | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Healthcare management service organization (MSO) services, namely, providing practice organization, management and administrative support services to individual physicians, hospitals and ancillary provider partners; Business administration services in the field of healthcare; Business and management consulting for healthcare providers and related businesses; Business services provided to the healthcare industry, namely, the collection, reporting, and analysis of healthcare quality data for business purposes; Collecting and analyzing claims data from healthcare organizations for business purposes; Consulting in the fields of healthcare operations management and hospital operations management; Consulting services in the field of patient relationship management for healthcare providers; Data processing services in the field of healthcare; Electronic data collection and data submission services for business purposes in the fields of medicine and healthcare; Vendor management services for healthcare facilities; Billing services in the field of healthcare; Medical billing support services; Release of information (ROI) services for others; Business services provided to a network of health care providers, namely, the negotiation and execution of contracts with health care payors and providing access to contracts with established healthcare payors; Business services provided to a network of health care providers, namely, the negotiation and execution of capitated contracts with health care payors and connecting healthcare providers with established healthcare payors via capitated contracts | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial consultancy services in the area of healthcare; Medical insurance case and utilization review and insurance claims adjustment services for healthcare purchasers and payors and providers and Medicare beneficiaries; Providing counseling and consulting in the field of healthcare benefits; Providing information about healthcare insurance plans | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Preventive health care and medical wellness services, namely, cardiac and cardiorenal risk reduction, and cardiorenal, cardiovascular and chronic kidney disease management services; Preventive health care and medical wellness programs utilizing evidence-based best medical practices, optimization of care management and population management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIA VITAE MSO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VIA VITAE MSO, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named SC²
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |