Drawing for INTERNET.ORG

USPTO serial 87634735

INTERNET.ORG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSS, KATHERINE M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNET.ORG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allisen Pawlenty-Altman

Allisen Pawlenty-Altman KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP607 14th Street NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20005-2018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; communication software and communication computer hardware for providing access to the Internet; telecommunications equipment for providing third party access to, and enabling the transmission of video, data and voice over, global communications networks, namely, mobile and access computer and mobile telephone terminals, base transceiver stations and wireless radio parts thereof, data transceivers, data repeaters, routers and switches, transmission circuits, integrated circuits, computer hardware, mobile cloud clients and servers, multiplexers, digital signal processors, radio frequency signal processors, mobile switching circuits, air traffic electrical controllers, mobility electrical controllers, access electrical controllers, remote port electrical controllers, radio ports, antennas, electronic radio components, and mobile core networks comprising data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection, transmission and management of data, voice and video; telecommunications software for operating and managing telecommunications equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 16, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 15, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 7, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance