USPTO serial 87641525
CLEAN VOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEAN VOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R. Bilak
MARK R. BILAK MURPHY, BILAK & HOMILLER, PLLC1255 CRESCENT GREEN, SUITE 200CARY, NC 27518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic sound, namely downloadable musical sound recordings; digital audio processing devices, namely, digital audio processors; wireless sound amplifiers; smart phone wireless transmitting and receiving sound amplifiers; audiovisual receivers; apparatus for recording, transmission, processing and reproduction of sound, images or data; sound recording apparatus; sound reverberation units in the nature of digital sound processors; stereophonic apparatus, namely, stereo tuners, stereo receivers, stereo amplifiers; electroacoustic emphasisers, namely, electroacoustic sound amplifiers; electric audio and visual apparatus and instruments, namely, audiovisual receivers; electroacoustic sounds amplifiers; electroacoustic transducers; electric audio and visual headsets for use with virtual reality games; electric audio and visual apparatus and instruments, namely, audiovisual receivers; central processing units for processing information, data, sound or images; portable sound recording apparatus; portable sound reproducing apparatus; accessories for MP3 players in the nature of earphones; accessories for PDAs in the nature of earphones; accessories for digital or electronic tablet computers in the nature of earphones; earphones for use with mobile telecommunication devices; wireless earphones; earphones for smart phones; audio earphones; earphones; earphones and headphones; earphone holders; earphones for electric audio and visual apparatus and instruments; telephone earpieces in the nature of earphones; earphones for cellular telephones; headsets for MP3 players; headsets for virtual reality games; headsets for digital or electronic tablet computers; headsets for mobile phones; necklace type headset, namely, headsets featuring a neckband for holding the headset cords for use with cell phones; wireless headset for wireless phones; wireless headsets for use with virtual reality games; audiovisual headsets for playing video games; wireless headsets for smartphones; wire headset, namely, headsets for use with cell phones; wireless headsets for use with mobile telephones; headsets for mobile telephones; mobile telecommunications handsets; headsets for telephones; headsets for use with computers; communications headsets for use with communication radios, intercom systems, or other communications network transceivers; wireless headset for cellphones; headsets for cellular phones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |