USPTO serial 87642927
BRYAN CAVE BERWIN LEIGHTON PAISNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRYAN CAVE BERWIN LEIGHTON PAISNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew G. Minder
MATTHEW G. MINDER BRYAN CAVE LLP211 NORTH BROADWAY, SUITE 3600ST. LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Legal services; legal research; legal advice; legal advisory services; legal consultation services; legal administration of licenses; litigation support services, namely, conducting electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit; providing an on-line interactive database featuring legal information; licensing of software and databases for document management and document administration; Information technology consultancy; computer software development services; design and development of computer software; quality management services, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance, and quality control, in the field of legal services; Providing continuing legal education courses; Information and data compiling and analyzing relating to legal practice business management and business management; business cost management services, namely, tracking, reporting, analyzing and delivering legal expenses for businesses and cost center information for assessing and determining variance in legal department budgets, business trends, cost management complexity, business risk management, profit loss exposure, staffing capacity, and business management of case resolution; business strategic planning services; business and legal practice management consulting, strategic planning, and advisory services provided to in-house law departments; business cost management consulting, namely, legal expense analysis to foster visibility, reduce legal expenses, improve predictability of legal expenses, model alternative fee arrangements, and make recommendations on electronic-billing platforms; business merger consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |