Drawing for EPSIMA

USPTO serial 87644382

EPSIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPSIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Woldow

SCOTT D. WOLDOW SMITH, GAMBRELL, RUSSELL, LLP1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST. NW, SUITE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical gels comprised of plant-based oils for use in the manufacture of cosmetics and toiletries; plant extracts, other than essential oils, for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; higher fatty acids for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; protein for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; aromatic hydrocarbons for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; aromatic compounds, namely, organic industrial chemicals for industrial and commercial use, for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; preservatives, other than antimicrobial preservatives, for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; biochemical additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; emollients for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; chemical preparations for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; chemicals in the nature of powdered pearls as raw materials for us in the manufacture of cosmetics; collagen for use as a raw ingredient in the manufacture of cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance