Drawing for BIGSURIFIC

USPTO serial 87645399

BIGSURIFIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIGSURIFIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd Winter

Todd Winter WINTER LLP1901 NEWPORT BLVDSTE. 350COSTA MESA, CA 92627

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Essential oils; essential oils derived from hemp; all of the aforementioned containing CBD derived solely from industrial hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basisACTIVE—
005Herbal supplements; Liquid herbal supplements; Medicinal herbal extracts, Medicinal herbal preparations; Natural herbal supplements; Tinctures, namely, medicinal herb extracts; all the aforementioned containing hemp derivatives derived solely from industrial hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basisACTIVE—
034Electronic cigarettes; smoking alternatives, namely, smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe; electronic smoking vaporizers, namely, electronic cigarettes; electronic cigars, namely, vapor cigars; electronic cigarette components in the nature of electronic inhalation devices comprised of electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty, electronic cigarette atomizers, electronic cigarette cartomizers and refill liquid solutions being chemical flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges containing CBD derived solely from industrial hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 27, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 24, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 25, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 23, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 9, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 24, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance