Drawing for GEN

USPTO serial 87647586

GEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODWIN, KATRINA JOYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynnel Reyes

7135 S Decatur Blvd.Las Vegas, NV 89118UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer hardware consulting services regarding the design, construction, management and operation of computer and networking systems to increase resiliency, sustainability, and efficiency; computer software consulting services regarding the design, construction, management and monitoring of the operation of computer and networking systems of others to increase resiliency, sustainability, and efficiencyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 4, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 5, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 5, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 4, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 1, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 6, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 8, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance