Drawing for CIRCIT

USPTO serial 87648650

CIRCIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIRCIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Radiance W. Harris

Radiance W. Harris Radiance IP Law, LLC5257 Buckeystown Pike #175Frederick, MD 21704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile and cellular phones, namely, software for creating video content, playing games, and social networking; Computer game programs; Computer game software; Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable electronic game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for creating video content, playing games, and social networking; Electronic game programs; Electronic game software; Interactive game programs; Interactive game softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance