USPTO serial 87649165
SAMUEL JOSEPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2019
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with SAMUEL JOSEPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brooklyn, NY, US
Brooklyn, NY, US
Brooklyn, NY, US
BAYONNE, NJ, US
NEW YORK, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Faham
David Faham Faham Law LLC294 Maplewood AvenueOakhurst, NJ 07755United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Boot accessories, namely, fitted decorative covers for boots; Boot cuffs; Boot uppers; Boots; Boots for motorcycling; Boots for sport; Moccasins; Sandals; Shoes; Shoes for babies, adults, children, women, men; Shoes with hook and pile fastening tapes; Slippers; Sneakers; After ski boots; Anglers' shoes; Ankle boots; Apres-ski shoes; Aqua shoes; Athletic shoes; Ballet shoes; Ballet slippers; Ballroom dancing shoes; Baseball shoes; Basketball sneakers; Bath sandals; Bath slippers; Beach shoes; Boat shoes; Bowling shoes; Boxing shoes; Brogue shoes; Canvas shoes; Chappals; Climbing boots; Climbing shoes; Cycling shoes; Dance shoes; Dance slippers; Deck-shoes; Disposable slippers; Drivers as shoes; Espadrilles; Esparto shoes or sandals; Foam pedicure slippers; Foot volleyball shoes; Football boots; Football boots and studs therefor; Football shoes; Footwear, namely, work boots; Golf shoes; Gym boots; Gymnastic shoes; Half-boots; Handball shoes; Hiking boots; Hockey shoes; Horse-riding boots; Hunting boot bags; Hunting boots; Infants' shoes and boots; Jandals; Japanese style sandals (zori); Japanese toe-strap sandals (asaura-zori); Knitted baby shoes; Lace boots; Ladies' boots; Leather boots; Leather shoes; Leather slippers; Leisure shoes; Motorcyclist boots; Mountaineering boots; Mountaineering shoes; Mukluks; Mules; Oxford shoes; Pedicure sandals; Pedicure slippers; Platform shoes; Plimsolls; Rain boots; Riding boots; Riding shoes; Rubber shoes; Rugby shoes; Running shoes; Sandals and beach shoes; Ski boot bags; Ski boot cases; Ski boots; Ski and snowboard shoes and parts thereof; Skiing shoes; Snow boots; Snowboard boots; Soccer boots; Soccer shoes; Sports shoes; Tap shoes; Tennis shoes; Thong sandals; Toe straps for Japanese style sandals (zori); Track and field shoes; Training shoes; Trekking boots; Valenki; Volleyball shoes; Water proof boots; Water repelling boots; Water repelling leather boots; Water repelling leather shoes and boots; Waterproof leather boots; Waterproof leather shoes; Waterproof leather shoes and boots; Winter boots; Women's shoes; Women's shoes, namely, foldable flats; Women's foldable slippers; Work shoes and boots; Zori | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by White Line Collections, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by White Line Collections, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by White Line Collections, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by LFH BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by UNITED BRANDS GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SAMUEL JOSEPH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |