USPTO serial 87650020
CARMOJI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARMOJI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Kaden
JEFFREY M. KADEN GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.8TH FLOOR, 270 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software applications for mobile phones for providing online auction services; Software applications for mobile phones for use in selling and auctioning vehicles; Software applications for mobile phones for use in allowing users to bid on and purchase vehicles; Software applications for mobile phones for use in allowing users to upload photographs and information on vehicles; Software applications for mobile phones for use in the search and retrieval of information on vehicles; Software applications for mobile phones for use in providing on-line trading services in which a vendor posts products to be auctioned and bidding is done via the internet; computer software for providing online auction services; computer software for use in selling and auctioning vehicles; computer software for use in allowing users to bid on and purchase vehicles; computer software for use in allowing users to upload photographs and information on vehicles; Computer software for use in the search and retrieval of information on vehicles; computer software for use in providing on-line trading services in which a vendor posts products to be auctioned and bidding is done via the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | online auction services; auctioning of vehicles; providing online marketplaces for sellers and buyers of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to allow customers to bid on and purchase vehicles; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to allow users to upload photographs and information on vehicles; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in the search and retrieval of information on vehicles; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for facilitating online sales between buyers and sellers of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |