USPTO serial 87652198
EVERGLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERGLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dianne Smith-Misemer
Dianne Smith-Misemer Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Boulevard, Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Irrigation sprinklers; drip irrigation emitters, irrigation fittings, namely, valves, irrigation spray nozzles, couplers; irrigation spray nozzles; drip irrigation systems comprised of drippers, drip line, pc drippers, button drippers, adjustable drippers, in-line drippers, flag drippers; agricultural irrigation units; sprinkler systems for irrigation comprised of irrigation sprinklers, pumps, valves and filters; irrigation apparatus for horticultural and agricultural use, namely, spray nozzles, water flow regulating valves; sprinkler systems for lawn and crop irrigation comprised of irrigation sprinklers, pumps, valves and filters, drippers, drip line, pc drippers, button drippers, adjustable drippers, in-line drippers, flag drippers; sprinkler machines for agricultural irrigation; sprinkler machines for horticultural irrigation; automatic sprinkler apparatus for agricultural irrigation | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Gardening articles, namely, flower pots, flower-pot covers (not made of paper), gardening gloves, nozzles for watering cans, planter boxes for domestic gardening, sprinkling devices, nozzles for sprinkling devices, watering cans, watering can sprinklers, nozzles for hosepipes, flower vases, gardening gloves; ; sprinklers, namely, grass sprinklers and lawn sprinklers; lawn sprinklers; nozzles for sprinkler hoses; sprinklers for watering flowers and plants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |