USPTO serial 87652567
ADNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2021
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ADNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rocky Hill, CT, US
Farmington, CT, US
Farmington, CT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne F. Reinke, Esq.
Wayne F. Reinke, Esq. HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation and maintenance of computer systems, computer networking hardware and peripherals; installation and maintenance of computer network security hardware; firewall management services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of firewall computer hardware repair; technical support services in the nature of diagnosing firewall computer hardware problems | ACTIVE | Feb 5, 1993 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing educational speakers in the field of information technology; security awareness training in the field of computer security, information security, personal security and Internet security | ACTIVE | Apr 16, 2014 |
| 042 | managed security services and computer network security services, namely, identification and analysis of security alerts received in real time and corresponding sources of the security alerts, classifying security alerts according to the criticality of the alerts, determining a priority level of the security alerts and reporting the security alerts based on customer preferences, severity of the security alert and when received; identification and analysis of security alerts and corresponding sources of the security alerts, classifying security alerts according to the criticality of the alerts, determining a priority level of the security alerts and reporting the security alerts; virtual chief information officer (CIO) services in the nature of providing consulting services in the field of planning, design and management of information technology systems and computer systems integration; computer systems and network consulting services, namely, advising and recommending hardware and software computing and networking systems, computer, network and internet security systems, and computer and network systems management practices; computer systems and network diagnostic services; computer disaster recovery planning; computer network design services for others; computer services, namely, providing computer network security consulting; installation and maintenance of computer software; installation and maintenance of computer network security software; computer services, namely, consulting regarding choosing components for individual computer systems; computer software application development services; computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; information technology consultation for computer reliability risk assessment; computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts quality control; firewall management services, namely, software patching and updating, troubleshooting of computer software problems, diagnosing and repair of computer software problems, configuration and maintenance of firewall software network infrastructure, configuration management of firewall computer hardware; managed security services in the nature of security information event management (SIEM), namely, electronic collection and analysis of real-time network information to manage and respond to security vulnerabilities and external threats; computer security consultation for computer security risk assessment for assurance compliance with industry standards; computer security consultation for computer security risk assessment; computer security consultation for computer security policy review and development | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1993 |
| 045 | regulatory compliance services in the nature of computer security risk assessment as it applies to applicable government regulations | ACTIVE | Apr 16, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADNET Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ADNET Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ADNET Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ADNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |