Drawing for COGNITIVE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 87654300

COGNITIVE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5471706Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2018
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with COGNITIVE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melvyn J. Simburg

Melvyn J. Simburg Simburg Law Offices, PLLC300 Lenora St. #1329Seattle, WA 98121-4211United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR PIPELINE CONDITION AND FAILURE PREDICTION USING A COMBINATION OF DISCOVERY, BIG DATA AGGREGATION AND CORRELATION, MAPPING AND VISUALIZATION, CUSTOM PIPELINE DATA ANALYSIS ALGORITHMS, MACHINE LEARNING AND PREDICTIVE ANALYTICSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 31, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2026CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORDโ€”
Mar 25, 2026NCS8NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILEDโ€”
Mar 25, 2026C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)โ€”
Sep 4, 2025PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8โ€”
Feb 24, 2025PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8โ€”
Feb 19, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGALโ€”
Feb 14, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGALโ€”
Oct 24, 2024ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
May 20, 2024ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVEDโ€”
May 15, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILEDโ€”
Dec 7, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVEDโ€”
May 15, 2018R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Apr 9, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Apr 1, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Mar 28, 2018AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILEDโ€”
Mar 27, 2018CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERโ€”
Mar 27, 2018IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTEDโ€”
Mar 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Mar 24, 2018AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Mar 24, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILEDโ€”
Mar 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2018EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 2, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Dec 6, 2017TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNEDโ€”
Dec 6, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Oct 24, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance