Drawing for RETURN ON AI

USPTO serial 87655585

RETURN ON AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RETURN ON AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. Coleman

BRIAN R. COLEMAN PERKINS COIE LLP3150 PORTER DRIVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software used for the control of voice controlled information and communication devices; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data for use in business process management; Downloadable customer service software incorporating a platform for users to develop business by using artificial intelligence and analytical computer modelsACTIVE—
035Business marketing and business risk assessment consultation services; Business networking services; Business consultation services, namely, business process improvement; Business development services; Business consultation in the field of telecommunicationsACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, automated telephone call screening services, automated telephone voice message services; Providing voice chat services; Providing voice communication services via the InternetACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, presentations and retreats in the fields of artificial intelligence, business and telecommunication services; publishing of electronic publicationsACTIVE—
042Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; Software as a service (SAAS) service featuring software for use in data collection, interpretation and database management in the field of business process managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance