USPTO serial 87656140
MIWA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2019
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with MIWA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip L. Kim
Phillip L. Kim IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate MallSuite 200San Diego, CA 92121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal locks and keys therefor; lock cylinders of metal; split rings of common metal for keys; [ metal knobs; ] door handles of metal; [ door knobs of common metal; ] metal padlocks; locks of metal for use on buildings, other than electric; metal latches; metal deadbolts [ ; metal hooks ] | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 009 | [ Computer programs and computer software for security in home and office; ] electric locks; electronic locks; integrated circuit key card locks (smart key card locks), namely, locks operated by a key card embedded with a microchip used with a RFID reader; access control systems comprising key cards and key tags embedded with microchips and RFID readers which communicate with a control panel to lock and unlock doors; [ electronic access control systems for interlocking doors; computer hardware and peripheral devices; ] computer software, recorded, for access control systems for use to lock and unlock doors; computer software, recorded, for key card issuing systems for use to access security systems in home, office and hotel; [ downloadable computer software and applications for security in home, office and hotel for use to allow a smartphone to operate as a key to lock and unlock doors; ] integrated circuit cards (smart cards); [ encoded cards, magnetic; magnetic encoders; magnetic encoded card readers; ] data processing equipment, namely, RFID readers; [ smart card readers; card encoders for issuing cards bearing encoded information; electric control panels; electric control panels for locks; ] boxed control devices for electric locks; [ remote controls for electric locks; electric controlled locker boxes (strong boxes); ] encoded key cards; keyless entry system for hotels comprised of an electronic signal receiver and software application as an electronic signal transponder; radio-frequency controlled locks [ ; biometric access control systems comprised of biometric readers for use as a lock system to provide security in home, office and hotel; biometric scanners; personal digital assistants (PDA) operated electronic locks for security in home, office and hotel ] | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIWA LOCK CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MIWA LOCK CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MIWA LOCK CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MIWA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |