USPTO serial 87657578
BIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2019
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with BIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2500 Valby, Copenhagen, DK
2500 Valby, Copenhagen, DK
Copenhagen, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell A. Tuchman
Mitchell A. Tuchman MORNINGSTAR LAW GROUP700 W. Main St.DURHAM, NC 27701United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Architectural services, namely, architectural design of new and renovated buildings for public and private residential, commercial, business, office, industrial, educational, governmental and cultural purposes; architectural services, namely, design of environmentally sustainable buildings; architectural services in the nature of architectural design featuring space planning and space programming, computer graphics design in the nature of creating 3D models, architectural rendering and project animations; engineering services in the field of architectural product computer modeling; engineering services, namely, structural engineering featuring building component dynamics and seismic analysis of primary structural components; engineering services featuring indoor climate, energy and daylight analysis; façade engineering; engineering services featuring indoor climate and environmental analyses; computational fluid dynamics (CFD), using numerical analysis and data structures to analyze and solve problems involving fluid flows; product development services in the nature of conceiving solutions that address client needs for innovative products; computer modeling in the nature of comprehensive simulations of wind, daylight, shadow, energy and acoustical conditions pertaining to the installation and use of new products; product research and product failure analysis services; new product design services; computationally derived design methods, namely, new product design services utilizing computational methods; new product development utilizing sustainable designs; development of new products for others in the nature of building materials; testing of prototypes of new products for others; conducting feasibility studies in the field of new technologies; new product development for others and engineering services in the field of new product computer prototyping, 3D modeling and product rendering; interior design services, namely, space planning and space programing for new and renovated buildings; new product development for others in the field of new product computer prototyping of innovative materials for building interiors; spatial component development in the nature of creating 3D computer models of interior building spaces; interior design services, namely, selection of furniture and fixtures for interior spaces for others; landscape architecture services, with an aim to achieve particular physical, environmental and social outcomes, featuring land surveys and site mapping; design of vegetated walls; design of landscape site lighting and signage; design of irrigation and drainage systems for landscapes; design of specialty interior and exterior environment settings with a focus on climate change adaptation and resiliency design featuring green infrastructure and blue infrastructure to prevent and treat coastal erosion and effects of climate change; development of new products for others in the field of landscape materials and hardscape components; landscape architecture consultancy services; computer graphic design services, namely, creating of 3d computer models for design presentations; conducting feasibility studies in the field of environmental engineering; conducting feasibility studies in the field of new technologies | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2017 |
| 044 | Landscape design services with respect to both public and private, urban and rural sites; landscape design services for outdoor spaces in the nature of riverfronts, parks, campuses, plazas, streetscapes, roofscapes, courtyards and public art installations; landscape design services featuring site mapping; landscape design services, namely, identifying the nature and scope of client landscape requirements | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bjarke Ingels Group A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Bjarke Ingels Group A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Bjarke Ingels Group A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BIG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |