USPTO serial 87660577
MOJO KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOJO KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paolo A. Strino
PAOLO A. STRINO GIBBONS P.C.ONE PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA, 37TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10119-3701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of periodicals, newsletters, pamphlets and brochures in the field of housewares, home decorating, kitchenware, beverageware, serveware, cookware, home storage solutions, kitchen tools and gadgets | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications being periodicals, newsletters, pamphlets and brochures in the field of housewares, home decorating, kitchenware, beverageware, serveware, cookware, home storage solutions, kitchen tools and gadgets | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | A full line of kitchenware, glassware, serveware, bakeware, dinnerware, houseware, beverageware, kitchen tools and gadgets, entertaining items, cooking items and home décor, namely, cast iron cookware being casseroles, dutch oven, stainless steel cookware being saucepans, stockpots, skillets, non-electric griddles, non-electric skillets, casserole braiser, cookware, namely, steamers, serving casserole and buffet pan, kitchen tools being reamers for fruit juice, graters for kitchen use and for household purposes, serving tongs, whisks, vegetable masher, scoops, serving scoops, garlic press, household utensils, namely, turners, caddies for holding utensils for household and domestic use, dough and pastry rollers, pancake mold, trivet, and cookware, namely, casseroles, kitchen stone intended for use as a serving tray for use as grilling and baking surface, glass bowls, drinking glasses, wine glasses, glass beverageware, beer mugs, mugs, plates, portable beverage dispenser, creamer pitchers, sugar bowl, salt and pepper shakers, juice bottle sold empty, pitcher, ceramic plates, bowls, meal trays, serving trays, oil and vinegar bottles sold empty, stainless steel tea kettle, ice buckets, salt and pepper grinder, spoon rest, tiered food server; rotating holders for kitchen utensils, countertop holders for paper towels, napkin holders, knife block, collapsible storage containers for domestic use, soap dispenser, toilet paper dispenser, toothbrush holders, soap dishes, tea canisters and canister sets, drying racks for laundry, dish drying mats for kitchen; non-scratch micro-scrub sponge for household purposes; soap dispensing scrub cleaning brush for household use; plastic freezer pop forms; lunch boxes; lunch bags not of paper; cutting boards and cutting mats; trivets; vases; tea pots; napkin rings; abrasive scrubbing sponges for household use; spice racks; mug trees; dessert stands; tiered food servers; candle holders; banana hanger; countertop holders for paper towels; paper towel dispensers for household use; spoon rests; bowls made of common metals; serving trays made of common metals; vanity trays made of common metals; graters for household purposes; tortilla presses; kitchen ladles; serving ladles and cake and pie servers; oven mitts, all of the above intended for sales and distribution primarily through direct sales agents and not through traditional retail outlets | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Cooking oils, edible oils, all of the above intended for sales and distribution primarily through direct sales agents and not through traditional retail outlets | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Spices, sauces, flavored vinegars, all of the above intended for sales and distribution primarily through direct sales agents and not through traditional retail outlets | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents via online forum and social media forum in the field of kitchenware, glassware, serveware, bakeware, dinnerware, houseware, beverageware, kitchen tools and gadgets, entertaining items, cooking items and home décor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Princess House, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MOJO KITCHEN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |