USPTO serial 87663392
ACCORD LEDGER BLOCKCHAIN FOR LAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCORD LEDGER BLOCKCHAIN FOR LAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Omid A. Mantashi
Omid A. Mantashi Attorney at Law360 Grand Ave. Ste. 90Oakland, CA 94610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for smart contracts; Computer programs for use in distributed ledger platform technology; Computer programs for facilitating electronic distributed ledger platform transactions via telecommunications systems, data communication systems or global networks; Computer software for database management in the field of database and information management; Distributed ledger platform software for use in processing financial transactions; Computer programs for use in identity management; Distributed ledger platform technology for use in e-commerce or on-line marketplaces to allow users to perform electronic transactions via a global computer or mobile device network; Distributed ledger technology for contracts, legal documents, contract lifeycle management, and legal practice management; Computer software platforms for developing, building, and operating distributed applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |