USPTO serial 87665349
VALEVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALEVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vic Lin
VIC LIN INNOVATION CAPITAL LAW GROUP LLP19800 MACARTHUR BLVDSUITE 270IRVINE, CA 92612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely, providing a virtual currency for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; financial services, namely, providing electronic transfer of a virtual currency for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded or virtual currency accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; providing electronic processing of electronic virtual currency payments via a global computer network; electronic payment services by which customers may apply money or virtual currency from various sources for payment of goods and services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |