Drawing for BJKHFD

USPTO serial 87665613

BJKHFD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 610
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SULLIVAN, JOHN C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BJKHFD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Aerial combiners; Cameras; Clickers for training dogs; Earphones; Electrical plugs and sockets; Electronic collars to train animals; Eyeglasses; Microphones; Protective covers for smartphones; Spyglasses; Video monitorsTERMINATEDSep 6, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2025KNOTNOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED—
Aug 6, 2025KBOCTERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS—
Aug 6, 2025KONOORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED—
Aug 6, 2025KOFSORDER FOR SANCTIONS—
Nov 27, 2023KSCOSHOW CAUSE ORDER—
Sep 15, 2022KSNRNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - PENDING SCO—
Sep 15, 2022KSADSUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW—
Sep 7, 2022KSCOSHOW CAUSE ORDER—
Nov 9, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 5, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance