USPTO serial 87665753
YIN XIANG CHENG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2020
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with YIN XIANG CHENG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
Suzhou, CN
Other trademarks owned by Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
Suzhou, CN
Other trademarks owned by Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
Suzhou, CN
Other trademarks owned by Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM SCOTT GOLDMAN
WILLIAM SCOTT GOLDMAN GOLDMAN LAW GROUP1300 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W.; STE. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shorts; Women's clothing, namely, shirts, blouses | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Suzhou Wanyuan Wedding Dresses Co.,Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named YIN XIANG CHENG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |