USPTO serial 87665930
WISEPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WISEPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tsuen Wan, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia Q. Hu
PATRICIA Q. HU MUNCK WILSON MANDALA LLP12770 COIT ROAD, SUITE 600DALLAS, TX 75251UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile payments systems comprised primarily of mobile phones, tablets or PDAs and an electronic financial platform software or mobile application that accommodates multiple types of payment and debit transactions; wireless point-of-sale systems comprised primarily of a wireless terminal and an electronic financial platform software that accommodates multiple types of payment and debit transactions; wireless point of service devices; smart card readers; integrated circuit smart card reading devices; near field communication technology-enabled payment terminals and devices, namely, readers, Radio frequency identification (RFID) tags; wireless electronic payment terminals and devices, namely, readers, Radio frequency identification (RFID) tags; software development kits consisting of software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces for integration with third party mobile applications for use in point of sale transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design and development of wireless point of service devices, smart card readers, secure credit and debit card transaction reading devices, near field communication technology-enabled payment devices and terminals, wireless enabled payment devices and terminals; custom design services for wireless point of service devices, smart card readers, secure credit and debit card transaction reading devices, near field communication technology-enabled payment devices and terminals, wireless enabled payment devices and terminals; computer services, namely, developing and designing mobile payment software applications for others; creating and customizing web applications, service-oriented architecture (SOA) systems, merchant portals and terminal management software systems for others; computer services, namely, payment gateway software systems integration services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |