Drawing for HOLLADAY DENTAL STUDIO

USPTO serial 87666886

HOLLADAY DENTAL STUDIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLLADAY DENTAL STUDIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Tucker

BRIAN D TUCKER KIRTON MCCONKIE36 S. STATE STREET, #1900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Dental hygienist services; Dental imaging services; Dental services, namely, performing restorative and cosmetic procedures; Dental services, namely, treatment of patients with snoring, sleep apnea and TMJ (temporomandibular joint) disorders; Orthodontic services; Dentist services; Oral surgery and dental implant services; Providing a website featuring information for patients in the field of dental health; Providing information in the field of orthodonticsACTIVEJan 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 14, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 14, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 3, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 15, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 30, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 30, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 31, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Nov 3, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance